In the recent down economy, internal training departments
sometimes seemed to be the first to feel the effects of downsizing. In these
cases, it seemed that the battle was
actually lost months or years earlier, as training developed an internal
reputation as a soft discipline unconcerned with business impact (and so easy
to scale down). In other words, the departments, fairly or not, were perceived
as not really making a difference, as producing a series of events that could
be quickly forgotten. In other cases, these departments may even have created
over-training and burnout, because the department focused on content output and
not competency measurement. Hearing people describe some of these programs,
One of Franklin Covey’s 7 Habits is to begin with the end
in mind, and it has been found to be a useful perspective with many
applications. At Allen, I’ve seen this same disciplined thinking play out in
designing training. Specifically, our instructional designers have developed a performance model that
provides a line of sight from the business goals directly to recommended
learning activities. We call this process Performance Mapping.
When one creates Performance Maps, the goal is to provide a
meaningful learning experience that produces real business results and has a
lasting effect on learners. Performance Mapping drives ones decisions when
selecting strategies and activities for training.
0 comments :
Post a Comment